© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
        
        
          Response of young olive trees to nitrogen
        
        
          15
        
        
          and N
        
        
          4,
        
        
          whereas in pots of treatment N
        
        
          f
        
        
          no
        
        
          soil fertilizer was applied. The following day
        
        
          (16 April 2007), 0.45 g N, derived fromNH
        
        
          4
        
        
          NO
        
        
          3
        
        
          and dissolved in 1 l tapwater, were applied to
        
        
          each pot of the treatments N
        
        
          1
        
        
          , N
        
        
          2
        
        
          , N
        
        
          3
        
        
          and N
        
        
          4,
        
        
          whereas no N was applied to pots of treat-
        
        
          ment N
        
        
          0
        
        
          (Control). On the same day, the ol-
        
        
          ive trees of treatment N
        
        
          f
        
        
          were sprayed with
        
        
          0.3 g/l of 21-21-21 (N-P-K) soluble fertilizer.
        
        
          The rest of the soil N fertilizer was gradual-
        
        
          ly applied according to Table 1, whereas the
        
        
          olive trees of treatment N
        
        
          f
        
        
          received a total of
        
        
          six monthly foliar applications.
        
        
          
            Statistical analyses
          
        
        
          The statistical analyses were carried out
        
        
          using Genstat (10th Edition). ANOVA was
        
        
          applied and when the F-test was statisti-
        
        
          cally significant (P<0.05) the comparisons
        
        
          of means were performed using the Dun-
        
        
          can and the LSD (Least significant differ-
        
        
          ences) tests. Non-linear regression analysis
        
        
          was performed between the leaf dry weight
        
        
          (DWT) and the soil [NO
        
        
          3
        
        
          -N].
        
        
          
            Harvests - Measurements
          
        
        
          One week prior to each harvest, 36 soil
        
        
          samples (6 treatments x 6 replications) were
        
        
          taken from the pots using a soil auger. The
        
        
          samples were stored in a refrigerator and
        
        
          the following day the soil NO
        
        
          3
        
        
          -N was extract-
        
        
          ed using a 1:10 w/w soil to deionized water
        
        
          ratio. NO
        
        
          3
        
        
          -N was determined using a modi-
        
        
          fied hydrazine nitrate reduction method (21).
        
        
          Each soil sample was extracted and analy-
        
        
          sed twice and if the results differ more than
        
        
          10%, a third sub-sample was analysed and
        
        
          the mean of the three measurements was
        
        
          estimated. The dry weight (DWT) of the soil
        
        
          samples was determined after drying at 105
        
        
          o
        
        
          C
        
        
          until constant weight and the soil [NO
        
        
          3
        
        
          -N] was
        
        
          expressed on a dry weight basis.
        
        
          At each harvest, the above ground plant
        
        
          parts, i.e. leaves, stems and shoots, were cut,
        
        
          placed separately into plastic bags to reduce
        
        
          moisture loss and weighted (fresh weight).
        
        
          The length of the shoots and the diameter
        
        
          of the stems were also measured. The fol-
        
        
          lowing day, the roots were removed from
        
        
          each pot and washed from the soil using a
        
        
          sieve mesh; then they were placed into plas-
        
        
          tic bags and put in a refrigerator until the
        
        
          root length was measured. The root length
        
        
          was measured according to the method of
        
        
          Tennant (20) using square grids of 1 cm (for
        
        
          the first harvest) and 2 cm (for the rest 5 har-
        
        
          vests). All plant parts were washed using de-
        
        
          ionised water and dried by placing them
        
        
          into an air-forced oven at 80
        
        
          o
        
        
          C until con-
        
        
          stant weight.
        
        
          After drying, the plant samples were
        
        
          ground and 100 mg of each sample were di-
        
        
          gested with 2 ml H
        
        
          2
        
        
          SO
        
        
          4
        
        
          containing 1 g/l Se
        
        
          and 1 ml 30% H
        
        
          2
        
        
          O
        
        
          2
        
        
          . The digests were made
        
        
          up to 25 ml with deionized water and the
        
        
          concentration of ammonium-N was deter-
        
        
          mined using the indophenol blue method
        
        
          (22). There were two digestions per treat-
        
        
          ment and replication and if the results dif-
        
        
          fer more than 10%, a third sub-sample was
        
        
          analysed and the mean of the three mea-
        
        
          surements was taken.
        
        
          
            Results and Discussion
          
        
        
          At 201 DAF (last harvest), the DWT of leaves
        
        
          responded to N fertilization treatments (Fig.
        
        
          
            Table 1.
          
        
        
          Soil N fertilization rates applied monthly to one-year-old olive trees.
        
        
          Treatments
        
        
          Soil N fertilization rates (g/pot)
        
        
          16 April 2007
        
        
          15 May 2007
        
        
          15 June 2007
        
        
          Total
        
        
          N
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          0
        
        
          N
        
        
          1
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          0.50
        
        
          0
        
        
          0.95
        
        
          N
        
        
          2
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          1
        
        
          1.90
        
        
          N
        
        
          3
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          1.35
        
        
          2
        
        
          3.80
        
        
          N
        
        
          4
        
        
          0.45
        
        
          1.80
        
        
          4
        
        
          6.25