© Benaki Phytopathological Institute
LC-MS/MS multiresidue method in peaches
83
b
the slope of the regression line.
The precision of the method was esti-
mated by assessing the relative standard de-
viation (RSD) values of the five replicates at
both levels. According to the Document No
SANCO/2007/3131, repeatability with RSD ≤
20% is considered to be acceptable. The lim-
it of quantification (LOQ) was established as
the lowest concentration that gave satisfac-
tory recovery (70–110%) and precision (RSD
≤ 20%) data.
Linearity
Good linearity was found for most pes-
ticides with correlation coefficients better
than 0.990 in most cases. However, deme-
ton-S-methyl, fenpyroximate and methio-
carb sulfone did not exhibit a linear behav-
ior at the concentration range under study,
but at a narrower linear range, as shown in
Table 3. The dynamic linear range in electro-
spray ionization can be limited and gener-
ally depends on the physicochemical char-
acteristics of the analyte (3). In Table 3, the
basic calibration line parameters for the 56
compounds are presented (13).
Accuracy and precision
Recovery and repeatability of the meth-
od were established in order to evaluate the
method’s accuracy and precision, respec-
tively. Recoveries of 70–120% with a repeat-
ability RSD ≤ 20% are considered acceptable
(5), while in routine analysis, the acceptable
recoveries are 60 - 140%. The recoveries were
calculated using matrix-matched single-lev-
el calibration standards. Table 4 shows the
detailed recovery and repeatability data of
the pesticides studied. The majority of the
pesticides produced recoveries and RSD val-
ues within the accepted ones.
The recoveries of the pesticides ranged
from 65.7 to 125.3% with relative stand-
ard deviations (RSDs) less than 24.7% at the
lowest concentration level and from 70 to
110.9%with RSDs less than 27.1% at the high-
est level. In the cases of alachlor, aldicarb,
aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfoxide, bro-
muconazole, carbofuran 3-hydroxy, deme-
ton–S-methyl, hexaconazole, mepanipyrim,
methiocarb sulfone, methiocarb sulfoxide
and pyrimethanil, the recovery and repeat-
ability values at the lowest concentration
level were outside the acceptable levels.
Therefore, the method is not considered
suitable for the determination of these com-
pounds at the lowest level. For clofentezine,
fenpyroximate, indoxacarb and prochloraz,
the RSDs at the highest concentration lev-
el were above 20%, but with satisfactory re-
coveries.
Limit of quantification/Limit of detection
As limit of quantification (LOQ) of the
method, the lowest validated level that pro-
duced acceptable accuracy and precision
results, which in most cases was 0.01 mg/
kg, was selected. In the cases of alachlor,
aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb sulfox-
ide, bromuconazole, carbofuran 3-hydroxy,
demeton-S-methyl sulfoxide, hexaconazole,
mepanipyrim, methiocarb sulfone, methio-
carb sulfoxide and pyrimethanil, the LOQ
was set at 0.05 mg/kg.
The limit of detection (LOD) of the meth-
od is the minimum concentration or mass
of the analyte that can be detected with ac-
ceptable certainty, though not quantifiable
with acceptable precision. The LOD of the
method was calculated as three times low-
er than the LOQ (LOQ = 3xLOD).
5. Analysis of real samples
To evaluate its application, the proposed
methodology was applied to the analysis of
real stone fruit samples. All samples were
extracted and analysed as described above
and the results are presented in Table 5. A
total of 14 samples of various stone fruit
(apricots, cherries, peaches and plums) were
analysed. Pesticide residues were found in
five out of the 14 samples. The pesticides
found were: carbaryl, carbendazim, indox-
acarb, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam and
thiacloprid. Three fruit samples contained
only one pesticide and two samples con-
tained two pesticides of the pesticides stud-
ied. However, the concentrations of the an-
alytes found in the samples, except for one
sample, were lower than the MRLs estab-
1...,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,...65